On religion:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html

and also from an interview from a journalist/commentator:

She assured me that Palin is not in favor of giving any rights to gays and didn’t want to give domestic partnership rights to government employees but that she had to veto the bill that would have rescinded such rights because of the Alaska Supreme Court ruling. So can we please cut this crap Log Cabin and the McCain campaign have been trying to put out: Palin only vetoed an antigay bill because she had to, by law.

Opposition research on her:
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_palin.html

Bob Barr may be as conservative, but he’s not as abrasive as McCain/Palin. Bob Barr is my protest vote.

I’ve found one unsubstantiated statement regarding Palin’s supposed intent to ban condoms – and I’ve found a 2006 article from the Anchorage Daily News which states that she is pro-contraception. While many people will disregard an Anchorage paper because it’s published outside the Beltway, I doubt that you will.