On the Log Cabin Endorsement of McCain and more on Palin

September 3, 2008 – 9:19 pm

The left has healthy skepticism on the inclusiveness of McCain. What does it mean to be inclusive? Most people believe that inclusiveness would be meaning treating the LGBT community of our country as equals. Even though Senator McCain did not support the Federal Marriage Amendment, he would like to ban it at the state level. Even though he would not mind sharing a beer with one of his gay co-workers, he does not support employment non-discrimination.

If inclusion means that we are welcome in his campaign, but he is not going to change his tune on any of the issues that matter to the community. Then, why bother endorsing him. There are many of us who would support McCain and the Republicans on many issues that concern us, but if they cannot support us as equal citizens, then how could they earn our support?

I know McCain wanted to solidify his base, but his vice presidential choice does not send a good message to independent voters and weak (in partisan leaning) Republicans. I agree its wrong to attack her about saying her recent pregnancy was allegedly fake. However there are policy issues that are ripe for argument.

Governor Palin in the past cut funding for pregnant teens, worked to ban books at the local public library, using government agencies against a former brother in-law. And in the church the governor belongs to, they are just as radical as Obama’s home church but with beliefs that “terrorism is god’s way to punish Israel for not converting to Christianity”, and they are hosting an ex-gay conference hoping that people in Alaska will be healed and converted to heterosexuality.

I still have no faith in the ticket. No matter how much lipstick Governor Palin wears.

Not Excited for Palin as VP

August 31, 2008 – 5:15 am

 

After finding out that Governor Palin was named as McCain’s VP, I just find the ticket demoralizing. Basically the social conservatives own the party, if you are not socially conservative the party is not for you. Even though you may agree with the Republican Party’s views on Iraq, Russia and energy exploration. If you are not socially conservative, there is nothing to be enthusiastic for this ticket. Since there has not been many ban-abortion, ban same sex marriage initiatives on the ballot, McCain had to do something to get the base to vote for him.

Palin has views that are outside the mainstream like banning all forms of birth control and condoms even for married and straight couples.

I would not expect McCain to support Ridge or Lieberman, but this choice does not inspire me.

Why don’t we focus on issues aside from the cultural issues. Like a balanced budget, energy exploration, reforming the health care system.

I just can not support Obama, he’s dangerous just like President Carter who helped increase Islamic radicalism. It seems third party will be the way it will be for me.

And sadly McCain did a rash decision that will lead to Obama winning Alaska.

The Inland Utopia Interview: Michael Mendez for Assembly District 61

August 28, 2008 – 6:37 am

As a public service I decided to contact the Libertarian Party’s nominee and ask him several questions that are relevant to the campaign for State Assembly in California’s 61st Assembly District of Chino, Montclair, Ontario and Pomona.

I am covering this race completely so the voters would have an informed choice. Thank You Michael for participating.

1.       How can we live within our means as Californians?

If you mean as Californian citizens, then merely live below your means. Make a plan and stick to it even if you become something of a thrifty pariah. Cell phones and the internet are not necessities. Subscription television is not required to live. New cars are not necessary. Owning a car may not even be necessary. Don’t have children if you can’t support them without a job for at least two years. Don’t wait for any particular housing market, just try to set aside the money you need to buy a home. Save whatever money you have left and invest it in something that makes saving worthwhile. Sack lunches are a great way to save money over even a year versus buying fast food take-out.

2.       Would you support efforts to deport illegals who commit violent crimes? Yes, but for justice sake, hopefully, after they serve the required time for the corresponding crime.

3.       What led you to choose the Libertarian Party? I was born into a slightly conservative Democratic family-moderate boll weevils. At the age of twenty-one, around 1985, I investigated the different parties. Now, most of my friends were Republican and that added to my curiosity for the different political parties. When I studied the Libertarian outlook of government and being a responsible citizen, it did and continues to me to be the most logical party.

4.       With Proposition 8 how do you balance religious versus personal liberty? Or is there a way to balance both. I do not believe prop 8 to be a fulcrum between religious liberty and personal liberty. In regards to marriage, I believe that government should not make an opinion for or against marriage. So, my vote for prop 8 will be "no." And in that same spirit to the fairly recent decision for the state to recognize gay marriage, if it were for me to vote, I would have also voted "no."

5.       What inspired you to run for office? In the last days of October, 2007, I was thinking what it would take to run for office. Two days later, without my prompting, the southern California chairman of the Libertarian party gave me a call and asked if I would like to run for office as a Libertarian. I did not give it much thought and just said, "Yes." It was in October, 2006 that I first became active with the San Bernardino county element of the California Libertarian party. I started my involvement by first attending the San Bernardino convention, which is coming up soon again in October, 2008. We have had it at Biacci’s in Upland, but it will most likely be moved to a different venue in San Bernardino county.

6.       How can we get a budget approved on time? I have no well thought ideas on this, just my personal experiences of different committees I have belonged. It was always the exclaimation, "Oh, if we don’t use the money allotted us we won’t get it next year." I have always been disgusted at using money just so you can have it and possibly more the next year. If there is need for the money then plead that case. Perhaps, the legislative bodies can start thinking about the budget when the January term starts, then for February agree to complete ¼ of the budget items by the end of that month, then for subsequent months additional quarters of the budget until completed at the end of May. Any defaults to agree on a particular quarter of the budget should mean forfeiture of your salary for that month.

7.       Any ideas to simplify our state government to make it efficient? We need to wretch out the idea that government is the solution and safety net to everyday existence. We need to stop passing legislation that deals with cell phones, helmet uses and trans fat. We need to make eminent domain less viable than is currently. We should not be using our law enforcement for issues of vice or the drug war. Non-citizens and corporations should not have any undue access to the government. We should not berate any choice parents make for their children’s education and make that possibility easier with the lifting of taxes. We should immediately remove all vice taxes and so as not to encourage further bureaucratic bloating.

8.       Why should we vote Libertarian for State Assembly? The Democratic party and Republican party have become to many Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum. The Libertarian party offers citizens of these mainstream parties an interesting compromise. It offers the political soul of social conscience and financial responsibility.

Check out the Daily Bulletin

August 27, 2008 – 5:37 am

While Norma Torres is enjoying the Democratic convention in Denver, I submitted a letter that she will probably need to reply back or issue a campaign advertisement to answer the claims.

Check it out here. Or at your news stand August 27th.

It is an edited letter of a piece I wrote for my site earlier.

The irony is I am now independent in this election now. I am a free agent to help effect this race now.  My letter in May helped Wendy defeat Ben in the primary, but I am not going to advocate the election of Norma nor Wendy this year. I just feel sorry for the voters this election year. Mediocrity on parade is probably the theme this election year.

Open letter to the Yes on 8 canvassers in my neighborhood,

August 26, 2008 – 4:20 pm

I am disappointed that you need to find solace in reducing personal liberty of your fellow Californians. Yes, you want to keep the definition of marriage back to its original tradition. However your support of 8 is destructive to thousands of same sex couples and their children living from your neighborhood to your city and county who depend on the rights and privileges that come with marriage. The Yes on 8 people would like to paint their campaign as pro-marriage and children instead of anti-gay. However their campaign is indeed anti-gay and anti-children even though both sides do want to share in the institution of marriage.

Just because your children hear about equality in marriage in school or in the news, does not mean that they will be turning homosexual on you. Yes, you would like to make sure your children would share in your prejudice, but to be honest I would like them to make up their own minds.

Pro 8 people have explained that churches could be sued for not hosting ceremonies of same sex couples, but most people have the common sense not to request ceremonies in non-affirming churches. Yes, churches have the right to religious expression. However if the building is used for secular purposes the building should be open to all in New Jersey public accommodations law.

In talking points from the Yes on 8 campaign, they said pastors could be sued for speaking against same sex marriage as hate speech. However we are not in Canada, people can say the most lame statements and not be fined or in jail.

To the religious groups spending their time walking my neighborhood, I ask a question to you. Are there better things to spend your time and money such as feeding the poor and teaching children how to read?

Music not popular in the USA, August 25th 2008

August 25, 2008 – 7:28 pm

Mylene Farmer has a haunting electro-pop song called Dégénération.

Think of it as a mix between the movie Species and the Fifth element.

Embedding is disabled for this song. However its a worthwhile video.

There is not that much music outside of America right now that is catching my interest, but I will let you all know as time goes on.

Updates

August 24, 2008 – 4:30 pm

I am working on two stories for the blog. I am looking to profile and interview the Libertarian candidate running for Assembly District 61 Michael Mendez. Then my second story idea is discussing the lack of plastic bag recycling in Ontario, California.

Right now there is nothing much on my mind right now. However thank you for reading.

McCain, two steps backwards and one step forwards

August 16, 2008 – 8:25 pm

McCain is not appealing for my vote. I just can not support him. He rather thinks that abortion is okay, but supporting LGBT equality is a bad thing when McCain decided to send a trial balloon to the media about having former Governor Ridge of Pennsylvania as his potential running mate. Yes, McCain is pissing off the pro-life voters and that is a bad thing when you want to cement the support from the party base.

Then McCain decided to release his technology platform and it also sucks hard too. He believes that the media industries such as the RIAA and MPAA should wage war on their consumers and net neutrality is not what he believes in. McCain is more of a slave to the big companies than the consumers in our nation.

The primary system has led to us having two of the worst nominees for the major parties in our country.

Why I support marriage equality

August 8, 2008 – 5:45 am

 

I wrote this piece back in May when a local pastor I know submitted his column why Proposition 8 needs to be passed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, which resulted in 330+ replies to his column.

By Matthew Munson

Back in 2000 I knew the fight for same sex marriage was going to be futile. The proponents of Proposition 22 were well-funded compared to an unprepared group trying to oppose the initiative. They knew that the 2000 primary was going to be the perfect time to bring in their base of voters because the Republicans were having a heated nomination fight. Yes, it is understood that 62 percent did support this initiative. However eight long years does end up changing the views of voters regarding this controversial issue.

Most Californians do see the importance for the recognition of partnership rights and during May 15th, the California Supreme Court laid their landmark decision affirming the right that the right to marry is extended to gay and straight alike. In this case, supporters of Proposition 22 may say that the governor and the state Supreme Court may be violating the will of the people. However the courts are the checks and balances that prevent tyranny of the majority. Just as how Proposition 14 in 1964 was passed to allow discrimination in housing and rentals, it was repealed in 1967 with the US Supreme Court decision of Reitman v. Mulkey.

The dictionary is not a static book, the dictionary changes over time. The definitions of words including marriage evolve just as how generations have varied opinions of same sex marriage. The dictionary of today does include the mention of same sex marriage. The battle for same sex marriage is not for the validation of our behavior, it’s for equal rights for our relationships. It is about improving the lives for all families, straight and gay.

California has most of the rights and privileges extended to same sex couples with domestic partnerships. It is merely a symbolic victory in the state supreme court. Society may not be comfortable or accepting of the idea of the term marriage extended to same sex couples. However it’s integral for couples to be recognized as equal under the law. Federal law gives over 1,049 rights, benefits and responsibilities to opposite sex couples that are routinely denied to same sex couples, because of the Defense of Marriage act these benefits can not be confirmed. If straight allies are uncomfortable with marriage extended to same sex couples, then a parallel institution should be extended nationwide until society is comfortable for same sex marriage.

No one is going to force straight California to enter into a same sex marriage. Although it’s going to be a close fight, win or lose same sex marriage is inevitable. This decision was about civil marriage, if you want to have selective criteria about religious marriage you have the liberty to choose who can be married in your religious institution.

Norma Torres is Ms.Sanctuary City

August 8, 2008 – 4:42 am

Ever since the murders of Jamiel Shaw in Los Angeles and the Bologna family in San Francisco the Sanctuary city policies have became a big issue this year. It is understandable that cities want to protect illegal residents from deportation when they want to use them for witnesses or to be able to have them to confide to law enforcement. However those who are held in violent crimes should not be afforded such courtesy.

However Republicans in Sacramento have tried in the current legislative session to cut off funding for cities that actively undermine federal immigration enforcement. Unfortunately this bill died in committee where Democrats would rather keep violent illegals on the streets instead of protecting innocent bystanders.

When it comes to next year’s legislative session, will Norma Torres keep illegal residents who commit crimes on our streets? Or do the right thing and deport them because they are also violating federal laws. However when we look towards past precedence where Torres was the biggest advocate in making Pomona a sanctuary city for the illegal residents who may reside in her city, it is not likely she will deliver on public safety.

For this election, investigate into her opponents and make up your own mind.